ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Task Delegation and Burnout Trade-offs Among Primary Care Providers and Nurses in Veterans Affairs Patient Aligned Care Teams (VA PACTs) Samuel T. Edwards, MD, MPH, Christian D. Helfrich, MPH, PhD, David Grembowski, PhD, Elizabeth Hulen, MA, Walter L. Clinton, PhD, Gordon B. Wood, MS, Linda Kim, PhD, MSN, RN, PHN, Danielle E. Rose, PhD, and Greg Stewart, PhD
Purpose: Appropriate delegation of clinical tasks from primary care providers (PCPs) to other team members may reduce employee burnout in primary care. However, (1) the extent to which delegation occurs within multidisciplinary teams, (2) factors associated with greater delegation, and (3) whether delegation is associated with burnout are all unknown.
Methods: We performed a national cross-sectional survey of Veterans Affairs (VA) PCP-nurse dyads in Department of VA primary care clinics, 4 years into the VA’s patient-centered medical home initiative. PCPs reported the extent to which they relied on other team members to complete 15 common primary care tasks; paired nurses reported how much they were relied on to complete the same tasks. A com- posite score of task delegation/reliance was developed by taking the average of the responses to the 15 questions. We performed multivariable regression to explore predictors of task delegation and burn- out.
Results: Among 777 PCP-nurse dyads, PCPs reported delegating tasks less than nurses reported be- ing relied on (PCP mean � standard deviation composite delegation score, 2.97� 0.64 [range, 1– 4]; nurse composite reliance score, 3.26 � 0.50 [range, 1– 4]). Approximately 48% of PCPs and 35% of nurses reported burnout. PCPs who reported more task delegation reported less burnout (odds ratio [OR], 0.62 per unit of delegation; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 – 0.78), whereas nurses who re- ported being relied on more reported more burnout (OR, 1.83 per unit of reliance; 95% CI, 1.33–2.5).
Conclusions: Task delegation was associated with less burnout for PCPs, whereas task reliance was associated with greater burnout for nurses. Strategies to improve work life in primary care by increas- ing PCP task delegation must consider the impact on nurses. ( J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31:83–93.)
Keywords: Cross-sectional Studies, Patient Care Team, Patient-Centered Care, Personnel Turnover, Primary Health Care, Professional Burnout, Veterans
Primary care involves an array of tasks including gathering patient history, screening, evaluation, in- tervention, health education, care coordination, and communication with patients outside of face-
to-face visits.1– 4 An underlying objective of team- based care models such as the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is the development of an
This article was externally peer reviewed. Submitted 28 February 2017; revised 2 September 2017;
accepted 10 September 2017. From the Section of General Internal Medicine and the
Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Port- land Health Care System, Portland, OR (STE, EH); the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics and the Department of Family Medicine (STE), Oregon Health & Science University, Portland; the Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Seattle,
WA (CDH, WLC, GBW); the Department of Health Ser- vices, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle (CDH, DG); the VA HSR&D Center for Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA (LK, DER); the VISN 23 Patient Aligned Care Team Demon- stration Laboratory, Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA (GS); and the Department of Management, University of Iowa, Iowa City (GS).
Funding: This work was supported by the Patient Cen- tered Medical Home Demonstration Laboratory Coordina- tion Center (XVA-61– 041) of the U.S. Department of Vet- erans Affairs.
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170083 Task Delegation and Burnout Trade-offs in VA PACTs 83
co p yrig
h t.
o n 1
4 Ja
n u a
ry 2 0 2
2 b
y g u e
st. P ro
te cte
d b
y h ttp
://w w
w .ja
b fm
.o rg
/ J A
m B
o a
rd F
a m
M e
d : first p
u b
lish e
d a
s 1 0
.3 1
2 2
/ja b
fm .2
0 1 8 .0
1 .1
7 0 0 8 3 o
n 1
2 Ja
n u a ry 2
0 1 8 . D
o w
n lo
a d e d fro
m
interdisciplinary team that shares primary care tasks and allows members to work at the top of their competence.5,6 However, differences in power and status, as well as a lack of clarity about who should do what, makes delegating tasks a chal- lenge.7–9 Teams struggle with poor role clarity and confusion over responsibility for clinical tasks.10 –15
Team struggles over who should do which tasks may contribute to work-related burnout, a psycho- logical state characterized by emotional exhaustion, lack of enthusiasm, and feelings of ineffective- ness.16,17 Burnout is common among primary care providers (PCPs)18,19 and primary care nurses20, with potentially negative implications for patient satisfaction21,22, patient safety18,23,24, and employee turnover.25 Clinical workload, unstable and inade- quate staffing26, and performing tasks that do not take advantage of a team members’ skills27 are as- sociated with increased burnout. By contrast, per- ception that a team culture exists is greater28 and more sharing of clinical and clerical tasks29, are associated with lower burnout among PCPs and staff. Improving task delegation among interdisci- plinary team members in a PCMH model may thus reduce burnout among PCPs and staff.
In 2010, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) began implementing its PCMH model through the Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) initiative in VA primary care clinics. Within the VA PACT model, a “teamlet” consists of 4 members: a PCP (physician, nurse practitioner, physician assis- tant), nurse care manager (registered nurse), clinical associate (licensed practical nurse/licensed vocational nurse), and administrative associate (medical assis- tant). While guidelines were distributed describing the role of each team member30, teams were given substantial flexibility in determining their own work- flows. Early in the implementation of PACT, signif- icant differences existed between PCP’s and nurses’ perceptions of responsibility for specific clinical tasks: PCPs reported they perform most clinical tasks alone, whereas nurses reported they were relied on for the same tasks.11 However, these discrepant findings may have occurred because PCPs and nurses were sur-
veyed separately, rather than analyzing responses from PCPs and nurses in the same team. In addition, it remains unknown how perceived task delegation relates to employee burnout.
In this study we surveyed PCPs and nurses 4 years into PACT implementation to examine whether PCP and nurse perceptions of task dele- gation were similar or different within matched PCP-nurse dyads (ie, PCPs and nurses in the same teamlet). We examined factors that might contrib- ute to perceptions of task delegation and whether task delegation was associated with employee burn- out.
Methods Our study is part of the national PACT Demon- stration Laboratory Initiative efforts to support and evaluate the VA’s transition to the PCMH model. This study is based on the 2014 national provider and staff survey, which was designed to assess pri- mary care personnel’s perceptions of work condi- tions during PACT implementation.
The survey was reviewed by national union lead- ers through VA Labor Management Relations to ensure that surveys were not coercive or a danger to employees. The study was considered a quality im- provement project by VA national primary care leadership and was exempt from institutional re- view board review.
Procedures and Participants The survey was administered online from August 4 through September 1, 2014, using Inquisit software (Millisecond Software, Seattle, WA). A survey link was sent via E-mail to national VA primary care leadership, who disseminated it to leaders of the regional networks and local facilities with a request for them to distribute the link to local primary care personnel. Three E-mail reminders were sent, and no incentives were used. The survey asked respon- dents to self-identify using a nationally designated primary care team identifier; the completed surveys did not include individual identifiers. Because the survey was disseminated electronically through leadership channels, we do not know the exact number of eligible employees who were contacted; that is, we do not have a true denominator with which to calculate a response rate. We estimated the individual response rate to be 21% based on the number of providers (physicians, nurse practitio-
Conflict of interest: none declared. Corresponding author: Samuel T. Edwards, MD, MPH,
Section of General Internal Medicine, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Rd. (R&D199), Portland, OR 97239 �E-mail: samuel.edwards@ va.gov�.
84 JABFM January–February 2018 Vol. 31 No. 1 http://www.jabfm.org
co p yrig
h t.
o n 1
4 Ja
n u a
ry 2 0 2
2 b
y g u e
st. P ro
te cte
d b
y h ttp
://w w
w .ja
b fm
.o rg
/ J A
m B
o a
rd F
a m
M e
d : first p
u b
lish e
d a
s 1 0
.3 1
2 2
/ja b
fm .2
0 1 8 .0
1 .1
7 0 0 8 3 o
n 1
2 Ja
n u a ry 2
0 1 8 . D
o w
n lo
a d e d fro
m
ners, and physician assistants) who responded rel- ative to the number of providers in a panel man- agement database during the same period, which was the most reliable administrative data on per- sonnel nationally. Administrative records indicated that 8114 primary care teamlets existed in the VA at the time of our survey; 2809 teamlets had at least 1 respondent and 20.9% of active PCPs returned surveys. Our sample consisted of 721 PCPs and 598 nurses, who together compromised 777 PCP-nurse dyads in 554 teamlets.
Study Measures Employee Perceptions of Task Delegation/Reliance and Discordance We asked PCPs and nurses about how 15 common primary care tasks (Table 1) were performed. We asked PCPs, “To what extent do you rely on your teamlet to accomplish the following primary care activities?” We asked nurses, “To what extent does your teamlet/clinic team rely on you to accomplish the following primary care activities?” PCPs and nurses responded on a 4-point scale for each task: “not at all” (1), “slightly” (2), “somewhat” (3), or “a great deal” (4). We defined these measures as “task delegation” for PCPs and “task reliance” for nurses. We calculated the absolute value of the difference between PCP task reliance and nurse task reliance for each dyad; this was defined as “task discor- dance.” Two clinician researchers grouped the 15 tasks into 5 categories based on exploratory factor analysis and clinical experience. The task questions were developed by clinicians and social scientists
with experiencing practicing and studying primary care at the VA, and the questions have been used in several published studies.11,31,32
Composite Task Delegation/Reliance Score To generate a composite task delegation/reliance score, we calculated the mean of the scores for all respondents across all 15 tasks. We also calculated the mean task delegation/reliance score for each task and task grouping.
Burnout Burnout was measured by a single item, a 5-point measure used in the Physician Worklife Study and several other large studies of burnout among phy- sicians in the United States.33,34 The specific ques- tion is, “Overall, based on your definition of burn- out, how would you rate your level of burnout?” Responses were scored on a 5-category ordinal scale: 1 � “I enjoy my work. I have no symptoms of burnout”; 2 � “Occasionally I am under stress, and I do not always have as much energy as I once did, but I do not feel burned out”; 3 � “I am definitely burning out and have 1 or more symptoms of burn- out, such as physical and emotional exhaustion”; 4 � “The symptoms of burnout that I am experi- encing will not go away. I think about frustration at work a lot”; and 5 � “I feel completely burned out and often wonder if I can go on. I am at the point where I may need some changes or may need to seek some sort of help.” This question has been validated previously against the Emotional Exhaus- tion Subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inven-
Table 1. Primary Care Tasks and Task Groupings
Task Task Groupings
Gathering patient preventive services history (eg, immunization history) In-person data collection Screening patients for diseases (eg, doing a depression screen) Assessing patient lifestyle factors (eg, diet, smoking cessation) Receiving messages from patients (other than requests for prescriptions) Messaging Resolving messages from patients (other than requests for prescriptions) Responding to prescription refill requests Encouraging lifestyle modifications (eg, diet, smoking cessation) Counseling/education Educating patients about disease-specific self-care activities (eg, foot care in diabetes) Educating patients about medications Evaluating patients and making treatment decisions Decision making Completing forms for patients (eg, disability documentation) Responding to requests for home health care orders Responding to patient diagnostic and treatment data (eg, laboratory tests, radiology studies) Tracking data Following up on referrals (eg, to specialists)
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170083 Task Delegation and Burnout Trade-offs in VA PACTs 85
co p yrig
h t.
o n 1
4 Ja
n u a
ry 2 0 2
2 b
y g u e
st. P ro
te cte
d b
y h ttp
://w w
w .ja
b fm
.o rg
/ J A
m B
o a
rd F
a m
M e
d : first p
u b
lish e
d a
s 1 0
.3 1
2 2
/ja b
fm .2
0 1 8 .0
1 .1
7 0 0 8 3 o
n 1
2 Ja
n u a ry 2
0 1 8 . D
o w
n lo
a d e d fro
m
tory.26,33,35 Consistent with previous analyses, a score �3 was considered burnout.31
Staffing, Coaching, Huddles, and Tenure at the VA Other independent variables from the survey in- cluded perception of adequate staffing (“Is your PACT staffed at the recommended 3 FTE [full- time equivalent] team members to each PCP FTE?” [yes � 1/no � 0]), perception of recent staff turnover (“Has your teamlet had any changes in or loss of staff in the past 12 months?” [yes � 1/no � 0]), minutes spent in huddles (“Thinking about a typical day in your primary care clinic, about how much time do you spend on meeting with your teamlet/clinic to discuss patient care [eg, in hud- dles]?” [do not huddle (coded as 0 minutes), �5 minutes (coded as 2.5 minutes), 6 to 10 minutes (coded as 8 minutes), 11 to 20 minutes (coded as 15.5 minutes), 21 to 30 minutes (coded as 25.5 minutes), �30 minutes (coded as 30 minutes)]), presence of a PACT coach (“Did your PACT have a coach?” [yes � 1/no � 0]), and duration of VA employment (“How long have you worked for the Veterans Health Administration?” [�6 months (coded as 3 months), 6 months to 1 year (coded as 9 months), 1 to 2 years (coded as 18 months), 2 to 5 years (coded as 42 months), 5 to 10 years (coded as 90 months), 10 to 15 years (coded as 150 months), 15 to 20 years (coded as 210 months), �20 years (coded as 240 months)]).
Statistical Analysis We reviewed summary statistics to describe char- acteristics of the sample and to compare task dele- gation/reliance and burnout in PCPs and nurses. Because the composite task delegation/reliance score had a range of noninteger values, we used it as a continuous variable in regression models. We performed linear regression to test the association between independent variables and composite task delegation/reliance. We performed multivariable logistic regression to explore associations with burnout at the respondent level. Because some dy- ads came from the same teamlets (ie, some nurses worked with �1 PCP), we used GLIMMIX to account for teamlet-level effects. All analyses were performed using SAS 7.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure that missing data for some survey items did not affect the overall findings.
Results Among 777 PCP-nurse dyads, mean composite task delegation among PCPs was 2.97 (standard deviation [SD], 0.64; range, 1– 4) and mean com- posite task reliance among nurses was 3.26 (SD, 0.50; range, 1– 4) (Table 2). Among task subgroups, PCPs reported delegating more for messaging tasks (mean, 3.47) and in-visit data collection (mean, 3.31), and reported delegating less for tracking data (mean, 2.48) and decision making (mean, 2.53). Nurses reported being relied on more than PCPs reported delegating for messaging (mean, 3.66), counseling/education (mean, 3.60), and in-visit data collection (mean, 3.40). The mean (SD) dyad- level task discordance was 0.91 (0.43) overall, but it was highest for decision making (mean, 1.14; SD, 0.62) and tracking data (mean, 1.17; SD, 0.79).
A total of 48% of PCPs and 35% of nurses reported burnout (Table 2). Approximately two thirds of respondents reported appropriate staffing (PCPs, 64.3%; nurses, 66.4%), and just over half reported recent staff turnover in their clinic (PCPs, 54.4%; nurses, 54.9%). Mean huddle time was ap- proximately 14 minutes, and about half of respon- dents reported the presence of a PACT coach. Mean duration of VA employment was just over 8.5 years.
Appropriate staffing was associated with higher composite task delegation for PCPs (� � 0.179; P � .01) but was associated with lower composite task reliance for nurses (� � �0.119; P � .01) (Table 3). Greater staff turnover was associated with reduced composite task delegation for PCPs (� � �0.123; P � .02) but was not associated with composite nurse task reliance. Increased huddle time was associated with higher composite task delegation for both PCPs (� � 0.014; P � .01) and nurses (� � 0.006; P � .01).
Table 4 shows associations of composite task delegation/reliance and other team member and clinic characteristics with burnout. For PCPs, greater composite task delegation was associated with less burnout (odds ratio [OR], 0.62 per unit of composite task delegation; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 – 0.78). Among nurses, however, greater composite task reliance was associated with more burnout (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.33–2.5). In multi- variable analysis appropriate staffing was negatively associated with burnout for PCPs and nurses, whereas staff turnover and duration of VA employ-
86 JABFM January–February 2018 Vol. 31 No. 1 http://www.jabfm.org
co p yrig
h t.
o n 1
4 Ja
n u a
ry 2 0 2
2 b
y g u e
st. P ro
te cte
d b
y h ttp
://w w
w .ja
b fm
.o rg
/ J A
m B
o a
rd F
a m
M e
d : first p
u b
lish e
d a
s 1 0
.3 1
2 2
/ja b
fm .2
0 1 8 .0
1 .1
7 0 0 8 3 o
n 1
2 Ja
n u a ry 2
0 1 8 . D
o w
n lo
a d e d fro
m
ment were positively associated with PCP and nurse burnout. Presence of a PACT coach was associated with significantly lower burnout for PCPs only (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 – 0.86).
Table 4 also shows the associations of task dis- cordance and clinic/respondent characteristics with burnout. Dyad-level task discordance, the difference between perceived PCP task delegation and nurses’ reliance, was associated with burnout for PCPs (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.27–2.47) but not for nurses.
Discussion We observed several notable findings in this na- tional cross-sectional study of task delegation and burnout among VA PCP-nurse dyads. First, PCPs reported delegating tasks less than nurses reported being relied on. Second, while increased huddle time was associated with greater task del- egation for both PCPs and nurses, appropriate staffing was associated with greater task delega- tion for PCPs and less perceived task reliance for
Table 2. Perceived Task Delegation/Reliance and Prevalence of Burnout among Veterans Affairs Primary Care Providers and Nurse Care Managers
PCPs (n � 721)
Nurses (n � 598) Difference P Value
Composite task delegation/reliance (15 tasks) 2.97 (0.64) 3.26 (0.50) 0.91 (0.43) �.01 In-visit data collection 3.31 (0.71) 3.40 (0.66) 0.80 (0.63) �.01 Messages 3.47 (0.62) 3.66 (0.56) 0.62 (0.60) �.01 Counseling/education 3.05 (0.82) 3.60 (0.53) 0.85 (0.68) �.01 Decision making 2.53 (0.86) 2.76 (0.85) 1.14 (0.62) �.01 Tracking data 2.48 (1.01) 2.99 (0.91) 1.17 (0.79) �.01
Burnout Dichotomized 48.6 34.8 �.01 5-Level categorization
1 13.0 23.3 2 38.5 42.0 3 29.0 21.5 4 12.5 8.6 5 7.1 4.6 �.01
Appropriate staffing 64.3 66.4 .06 Turnover 54.4 54.9 .60 Minutes spent in huddles, mean (SD) 13.30 (10.90) 14.33 (11.61) .40 Presence of PACT coach 45.3 50.6 .06 Years of VA employment, mean (SD) 8.53 (6.37) 8.61 (6.90) .13
Data are mean (standard deviation) or percentages. PACT, patient aligned care team; PCP, primary care provider; SD, Standard Deviation; VA, Veterans Affairs.
Table 3. Multivariable Regression Examining Association of Reported Staffing, Turnover, Huddle Time, Presence of Patient Aligned Care Team Coach, and Length of Veterans Affairs Employment, with a Composite Task Delegation/Reliance Score
PCPs Nurses
� P Value � P Value
Appropriate staffing 0.179 �.01 �0.119 .01 Staff turnover �0.123 .02 0.013 .77 Minutes in huddle 0.012 �.01 0.006 �.01 Presence of PACT coach �0.005 .92 �0.026 .55 Years at VA 0.004 .35 0.005 .13
PACT, patient aligned care team; PCP, primary care provider; VA, Veterans Affairs.
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170083 Task Delegation and Burnout Trade-offs in VA PACTs 87
co p yrig
h t.
o n 1
4 Ja
n u a
ry 2 0 2
2 b
y g u e
st. P ro
te cte
d b
y h ttp
://w w
w .ja
b fm
.o rg
/ J A
m B
o a
rd F
a m
M e
d : first p
u b
lish e
d a
s 1 0
.3 1
2 2
/ja b
fm .2
0 1 8 .0
1 .1
7 0 0 8 3 o
n 1
2 Ja
n u a ry 2
0 1 8 . D
o w
n lo
a d e d fro
m
nurses. Finally, increased delegation of tasks was associated with lower burnout for PCPs, but in- creased task reliance reported by nurses was as- sociated with increased burnout. Dyad-level task discordance was associated with burnout for PCPs only.
The ongoing workforce shortage in primary care has led to urgent calls to make the practice of primary care more rewarding for clinicians, with the hope that this will increase the number of trainees who choose careers in primary care and retain PCPs currently in practice.36 One often- cited means to improve the worklife of PCPs is sharing the workload by having them delegate rou- tine tasks to other team members, thereby allowing them to focus on clinical care of patients. This study demonstrates that PCPs who report more frequent delegation of tasks to their primary care staff do indeed report less burnout. This is an encouraging finding, suggesting that efforts to im- prove task delegation may improve work life for PCPs.
However, nurses who perceived a high level of reliance for tasks also reported more burnout. This suggests that nurses may perceive task delegation as simply increasing their workload, which is a key contributor to burnout.17 Because nurses have a broad scope of practice, they can perform a wide range of tasks. When PCPs are unsure of which team member should be doing a given task, dele- gating to a nurse may become a default. This issue
could be exacerbated by inadequate staffing at the administrative associate levels. Such inefficient del- egation is consistent with our findings: We ob- served that, among nurses, perceived task reliance was higher in teams that were not fully staffed, suggesting that tasks cannot be delegated to other team members.
Task discordance, the dyad-level difference in perceptions of task delegation between PCPs and nurses, was associated with burnout for PCPs but not for nurses. Task discordance could reflect a communication problem that is more frustrating for PCPs. Alternatively, as nurses report high levels of task reliance for all tasks,11 this discor- dance could be driven by PCP responses and as such is more reflective of PCPs’ levels of task delegation.
Ideally, with training, coaching, and team hud- dles, the appropriate roles of each team member are individually negotiated and agreed upon, so that tasks are delegated appropriately, minimizing over- load on any 1 team member. It is encouraging to note that increased huddle time was associated with increased task delegation for both PCPs and nurses. In addition, among PCPs, the presence of a PACT coach was associated with increased task delegation, suggesting that practice facilitation has an important role in assisting teams to appropri- ately assign