Limitations of the Capstone Project Discussion Response
Limitations of the project
My capstone project depended on the positive cases that were reported to the local health department from the state and commercial laboratories. However, while analyzing this data I came to realize a limitation, which was that my result might be skewed because of the possibility of more cases existing that contradicts the results but were never accounted for because the individuals did not test because of fear of quarantining or isolating, which means they feared not being able to go to work or school and etc., or they were asymptomatic, or there was a backlog in positive cases from the laboratories that were never reported.
The second limitation I noticed is that my data relied solely on the fact that the information was collected using the self-reported method, this means there is a possibility that during the self-reported collection method, the individuals could have reported false data.
Impact of the limitation
Both these limitations can impact my recommendation by the fact that the data could misrepresent reality, however, although this thought and the limitations exist, the data did reflect similarities to various reviews of literature and pre-existing researches. This is why source credibility is important because the information is backed by a trusted, supported, credible and scholarly source. Therefore, using sources with academic credibility increases the impact of the message of the project that I am trying to promote, distribute, or teach (Sbaffi and Rowley, 2017).
Sbaffi, L., & Rowley, J. (2017). Trust and Credibility in Web-Based Health Information: A Review and Agenda for Future Research. Journal of medical Internet research, 19(6), e218. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7579
Respond to the bold paragraph ABOVE by using one of the option below… in APA format with At least two references and a minimum of 200 words….. .(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.) Include at least one scholarly reference and appropriate in-text citations and Address all points on the DQ. One point will be deducted for not addressing each item mentioned above. Remember that presenting someone else’s work as your own is plagiarism.
Ask a probing question.
Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
Offer and support an opinion.
Validate an idea with your own experience.
Make a suggestion.
Expand on your colleague’s posting.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class
To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.
REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED.
American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.