Super-Size Me Documentary Film Analysis Assignment Paper
You will write a short (3-4 pages, double spaces, 1” margin, standard 12-point font) analysis paper of one of the films listed below. You should articulate your opinion of the film and also discuss how it fits in with the history and theory. It should be clear from your writing that you have watched the film and are putting it into dialog with the materials. This assignment asks you to apply the theoretical concepts and historical frameworks from materials to a film of your choice. You need to use at least one theoretical chapter and one historical chapter in each of your analyses. Make sure you clearly identify which film you are writing about. You should have a works cited page clarifying which readings you are using in your analysis.
Please consider the following questions: How can you see the film as the creative treatment of actuality? Which models is this documentary? Which mode of the documentary do the qualities of the films most fit into? Explain your choices.
Super-Size Me (Spurlock, 2004)
Crazy Love (Klores, Stevens, 2007)
The Most Dangerous Man in America (Goldsmith, Ehrlich, 2009)
Blackfish (Cowperthwaite, 2013)
SSC 400 Our History is the Past Discussion
Watch these three short connected documentaries about access to outdoor areas by filmmaker Faith E. Briggs:
(Everything is a Youtube link so that you have access to captions, but you can find the website of the filmmaker, Faith E. Briggs, here (Links to an external site.)and the website for This Land here (Links to an external site.), and I strongly encourage you to look through those materials. Also, note that the documentaries do have corporate sponsors – filmmakers have to eat too, y’all.)Then…
In a brief response of at least 100 words, discuss two of the following questions while referencing the documentaries:
What do our text and these documentaries have in common? What is one specific commonality you can find between Our History is the Future and these short documentaries?
There’s some information here that folks might not consider to be academic; the stories are personal; the personal is very political right now. Why is it important, especially in an interdisciplinary studies program, to access and discuss materials that are not academic in nature, along with the academic papers and texts that we read? Why do we need to look at the experiences and knowledge of folks who don’t have “Dr.” in front of their name?